You are here: HomeEconomic participationA critique of the productivity commission's cost-benefit analysis in the 'disability care and support' report

Current CADR projects

Download a summary of our current projects;

We want to hear from you!

Help us improve the CADR clearing house

A critique of the productivity commission's cost-benefit analysis in the 'disability care and support' report

Mark Harrison,

Academic Literature

2013

In its 2011 NDIS report, the Productivity Commission rationalises its policy recommendation by means of a cost-benefit analysis, claiming that 'the benefits of the [National Disability Insurance] scheme would significantly outweigh the costs'. But methodology the PC adopts departs from conventional cost-benefit analysis in ways that understates costs, presumes the benefits, muddies policy comparisons, and jumbles equity and efficiency issues. These problems are traceable to the Commission's use of a 'distributional weights approach' to equity benefits. The 'basic needs approach' is an alternative way of dealing with equity considerations that better captures the underlying preferences of citizens and the rationale for disability care and support policies.

Publication information

Journal/Publication : Agenda: A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform

Domain/s: Economic participation, Sector development and sustainability

green strip

Research to Action Guides

  • A Guide for disability practitioners, schools, employers and young people looking to make the transition from school to employment in Australia....
  • The Culturally Proficient Service Delivery Research to Action Guide has been developed to assist in the provision of accessible, appropriate and effective disab...